1 Million X Preorders! So, Should Nokia Have Gone Android From The Start?


A couple of days back we heard from Nokia that their recently announced Nokia X smartphone has received 1 million preorders in China, great news for the Finnish manufacturer who are in the late stages of selling off their Devices and Services Division to Microsoft.

Initial reaction to the Nokia X family of devices which got their official launch at MWC back in February were somewhat mixed. Many were shocked at the news, despite all the leaks prior to the announcement, while others just didn’t see the point in a smartphone running Android which doesn’t have access to the Google Play Store. Derision came from some corners, but a reoccurring question was “Will these phones be scrapped by Microsoft?” While it wasn’t without it’s admirers, the overall impression I got based on these reactions was that the Nokia X, the X Plus and the XL may struggle to make much of a dent in the market. So imagine the surprise at the sight of this tweet from Nokia:

A million preorders on a single carrier in a matter of days! Now that would suggest that all the knockers and mockers might just have to eat their words on this one. These preorders are comparative to the sales Nokia’s Lumia range managed in their first quarter of availability. Does that suggest that a Nokia smartphone running Android albeit without the apps from Google actually has a huge demand? Do these numbers prove what a lot of people have been saying for a long time, that Nokia should have gone with Android instead of Windows Phone?

Before even trying to give a definite Yes or No perhaps we should look a bit closer at the “1 Million Preorder” headline. We have to bare in mind in this instance, a preorder does not mean a sale. It doesn’t even equal a commitment to buy. No money has been put up by anyone. But still, it is a good number of people showing an interest in buying the Nokia X, right? Well, yes it is, but there was an incentive for customers on Chinese carrier JingDong to hit the “Preorder” button. You could say it doubled as an “Enter To Win A Nokia X” button. That’s right, those who logged in and clicked “Preorder” would be entered into a contest to win the device.

So, using a clever way to get people to enter their interest, JD.com managed to compile a million entries. It is still a good achievement, and shows that there is definite interest in the Nokia X, especially at it’s attractive price of 599 Yuan (Just under £59/$99). But for me it isn’t enough to determine that Android would have been a better choice than Windows Phone for Nokia.

But what about a Nokia running Google’s Android OS? Nokia must have considered this option back when the “Burning Platforms” memo was sent out to Nokia employees, but there are still valid reasons why Windows Phone was the correct choice. The main one I can see is the fact their Mapping software in which they had invested heavily, would have had to take a backseat to Google’s own mapping and location services.

As for what will become of the X family of devices once it is under Microsoft’s control is anyone’s guess. Can I really see it being aborted? Well, yes I suppose I can, especially considering the fate of MeeGo Harmatten, but that is another story.

Lenny Bonsignore
Lenny Bonsignorehttp://www.OneTechStop.net
Lenny Bonsignore @LennyBons34 is Owner/Editor- in -Chief of OneTechStop, Sports fan, Tech guy, & Mailman by Day [email protected]

Latest articles

Related articles


  1. No, Windows Phone wasn’t the correct choice! That decision is the one why Nokia is selling it’s mobile divisions to Microsoft. Focusing on MeeGo and improving Symbian would have been much wiser and better for Nokia stakeholders. Adding Android app compability or even selling Android devices would have been much better than Windows Phone.

    • I don’t completely agree or disagree with you TBH. I would have loved to see MeeGo continued, but do believe Elop when he said it wasn’t viable due to development delays. If all had gone to plan before Elop took over, and the N9 had been released in 2010 when it was supposed to have been, then sure, it could have worked. Symbian, while a great OS didn’t match up to the likes of iOS so the idea of using someone else’s software and concentrating on just the hardware must have seemed appealing. Which I believe brings us to the choice of Android or WP, which ecosystem. As Nokia had invested so heavily in mapping, going Android would have been a conflict of interests, due to Google Maps. Doing a forked version of Android without Google services would have been a dangerous move, as Elop had the foresight to see how important a supporting ecosystem would be. So the only choice they could make was WP.
      That is at least my opinion, based on what I have seen, heard and read.

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.